Even though a nol poison pill was primarily designed to prevent the forfeiture of potentially valuable assets, it also has the effect of acting as an antitakeover device. What is a poison pill and why have so many companies adopted them recently. Delaware court declines to enjoin sothebys annual meeting rejects activist stockholders requests to enjoin the meeting pending an expedited trial concerning the companys twotiered poison pill. Transplanting a poison pill to controlling shareholder regimes.
May 5, 2014 on may 2, 2014, the delaware court of chancery denied a preliminary injunction motion by activist. Shareholder rights plans delaware supreme court sanctions use of 4. The journal of corporation law implemented quickly and easily. A company targeted for a takeover uses a poison pill. Well, sorry for drifting away from the topic, i mean thats what i was literally feeling after reading, glenn kaplan, a new york times bestselling authors latest book, poison pill. Adopting a poison pill in response to shareholder activism.
Institutions are very upset with unocal for putting in the poison pill. When a corporate board adopts a defense against a takeover like a poison pill, the unocal standard requires that the board show that it is acting against a threat to the company and that the boards actions are reasonable to the threat posed. The novel coronavirus covid19 pandemic has caused significant volatility in. What is a poison pill and why have so many companies. Although my initial reaction after reading the book was wtf. In response to the unocal move, the pickens investor group, mesa partners ii, may challenge the unocal offer on legal grounds, said john sorte, one of the groups investment bankers at drexel.
As regards unocal demonstrates a serious problem of fit. Nevertheless, the court again held itself bound by supreme court caselaw to hold this to be a realistic option for air products, thus rendering the defensive measures, including the poison pill, not preclusive or coercive under the unocal analysis. The effect of poison pill adoptions and court rulings on. A bnas bna insights corporate shareholder rights plans. Burkle has a legal case to challenge this poison pill. Occidental adopts poison pill to combat potential hostile. Download it once and read it on your kindle device, pc, phones or tablets. Furthermore, they determined that the subordinated securities to be exchanged in mesas announced squeeze out of the remaining shareholders in the backend merger were junk bonds worth far.
Advertisement by proposing to form a limited partnership, hartley is borrowing one of pickens devices. On the outset, poison pills provides an excellent case study of the duplicity and dysfunction present in much of the modernday pharmacological industry along with its. Sothebys is apparently not the only company to have enacted such a pill, though its the first whose twotiered, antiactivist pill was challenged in court. Thanks to steven davidoff, eric talley, and our own christine and gordon for sharing insights on the ebay v. We are closing the forum now, but intend to keep track of this issue as appeals wind there way through the delaware supreme court and new cases on poison pills loom. Hedge fund activism, poison pills, and the jurisprudence. I recommend this book to anyone in search of a great and informative read. Summary in mid20, three activist hedge funds, third point llc, trian fund management and marcato. Poison pill thresholds and activist shareholders financial. The board has an objectively reasonable belief of a threat to the corporate policy and effectiveness of the company a reasonableness test.
Poison pills relevance in the age of shareholder activism dealbook. Thus, the unocal test scrutiny was the appropriate test. Under unocal and unitrin the adoption of a poison pill will be protected by the business judgment rule as long as. But under parsons analysis, unocal deference still applies to the adoption of a poison pill, even one that distinguishes between activist and passive investors. The effect of poison pill adoptions and court rulings on firm entrenchment. A company targeted for a takeover uses a poison pill strategy to make shares of the. The conference board recommendations on poison pills. Nesi thoroughly covers the story of the vioxx drug scandal in a refreshingly honest way. The supreme court pointed out that delaware corporation law is not static, and must grow and develop in response to, indeed in anticipation of, evolving concepts and.
However, repellent characters, amateurish writing and a loss of focus on the main action make for a missed opportunity. The principal path for a bidder to remove a poison pill thus became the proxy contest route outlined in moran. Two novel uses of poison pills were tested in the delaware courts in. Covid19 hostile takeovers, poison pills, nol poison pills 2020. Delaware court upholds airgas boards use of poison pill february 18, 2011 in a muchanticipated decision, the delaware chancery court, on february 15, 2011, upheld the continuing use of a poison pill by the board of directors of airgas, inc.
Like chancellor allen, i have long thought that unocal has great potential to calibrate the actions of incumbent directors. The court held that such a poison pill was a reasonable and proportionate response by the sothebys board in response to a legally cognizable threat to corporate policy and effectiveness, and was not preclusive or coercive under unocal. Poison pill has the bones of a good corporatetakeover potboiler, an underexplored genre. Nols on the books of a potential target company, it will take a significant. Delaware court declines to enjoin sothebys annual meeting. If a poison pill is adopted in the absence of a cognizable threat of a potential hostile bidder, known activist or nols to protect, consider a limited duration of six to 12 months. A poison pill is a tactic utilized by companies to prevent or discourage hostile takeovers. David batchelder, chief financial officer of mesa, said, this is an attempt to confuse the issue by placing a carrot in front of shareholders in hopes that they will forget about the poison pill. The effect of poison pill adoptions and court rulings on firm.
The sothebys defense is part of a new turn in the use of poison pills against. With stocks down, corporate america is getting defensive. The terms of the pill are a proportional response to the threat a proportionality test. This is among the most common questions directors ask outside advisors as boards across corporate america ponder whether a shareholder rights plan aka poison pill is a prudent measure. The untold story of the vioxx drug scandal i couldnt put this book down.
The court similarly declined to hold that the boards dissolution plan was an unreasonable poison pill so as to invoke unocal. On october 4, 2010, the delaware supreme court issued an opinion affirming the court of chancerys decision in selectica, inc. While we might debate the correctness of any of these decisions, i applaud the court of chancery for continuing to develop its unocal jurisprudence. The court ruled that the enhanced scrutiny standards of revlon and unocal do not supplant the business judgment rule in.
The basic objectives of a poison pill are to make hostile takeovers. Consequently, notwithstanding its primary purpose, a nol poison pill must also be analyzed under unocal because of its effect and its direct implications for hostile takeovers. At the same time, other companies have built up massive cash balances over the course of the economic expansion of the last decade and are capable of deploying. Likewise, relatively few companies now have poison pill shareholder rights plans in place although many companies have poison pills on the shelf and ready to be deployed. Yet under the unocal test, delaware courts have been very permissive 4 in allowing boards to maintain and implement defensive measures, such as poison pills, for purposes well beyond protecting shareholders from coercive twotier tender offers, the offending hostile transaction in the unocal case.
Supreme court affirms chancerys poison pill decision. The chapter goes on to conduct a thought experiment that reshapes and extends unocal so that it does provide a robust basis for sustaining management defense against activist hedge funds, even shielding poison pills with 5 percent triggers. Newmark case and other poison pill cases this year. The unocal doctrine is a notoriously soft force in limiting board action in response to real or perceived threats to the corporate bastion. Ruprecht activism confronts the rights plan the delaware court of chancery refuses to enjoin sothebys annual meeting and allows sothebys poison pill to protect against an activists proxy contest. Second, the book is substantial in content, both overtly and between its lines. Caught in a war that pits greed and ambition against conscience and. The date of the poison pill s adoption relative to the date of the next meeting of shareholders i. I especially enjoyed the history of the pharmaceutical industry that he weaves into his story. The poison pill was a novel legal response to what was considered to be, in 1982, an increasingly hostile landscape for company boards. The uses and abuses of poison pills the new york times. The poison pill will be in effect at least until occidental shareholders get a chance to vote on it at the upcoming annual shareholder meeting, and. Thered be poison pill arbitrageurs whod buy poison pill rights to get the new shares, and prime brokers would finance the purchase price, and itd be a.
1301 676 1181 1054 1374 866 963 63 268 192 382 279 701 203 312 676 28 54 566 30 734 416 904 512 1358 636 1455 178 143